Random attack on Catholicism

February 19, 2007 by William K. Wolfrum 

Editor’s Note: Having recently noticed that Bill Donohue, the head of the Catholic League, was spending a great deal of time and energy fighting off imaginary Hollywood sodomites, we here at Williamkwolfrum.com decided to send out a more focused message to get Donohue back on track.

________________________________________________

Catholics eat babies, but only after cooking them like lobsters.

catholics eat babies
A baby, immediately prior to being
devoured by a Catholic.

–WKW

Comments

8 Responses to “Random attack on Catholicism”

  1. William K. Wolfrum » Blog Archive » Random attack on Catholicism II on February 19th, 2007 5:27 am

    [...] William K. Wolfrum « Random attack on Catholicism to get William Donohue’s attention [...]

  2. heather on May 11th, 2007 7:30 am

    what the heck catholics eat babies?

  3. William K. Wolfrum Chronicles » Blog Archive » No one expects a blogaround VIII on February 6th, 2009 12:00 pm

    [...] Phillip Barron: Over at Shakesville, we discover the existence of Cathoogle, a search engine for good Catholics. And while Catholic Enemy No. 1 Melissa McEwan is a non-person there, I’m quite happy to report that I have not been Cathoogle-tied. This shows up on the first page of a vanity search. [...]

  4. Catholic on February 10th, 2009 2:41 pm

    People these days are ridicules. Whoever wrote this needs to read the bible. Atheis people must have no life, as they do not believe in the Lord.

  5. Catholic # 2 on September 26th, 2009 7:02 am

    So where is your evidence that Catholics eat babies? I don’t think you have any evidence and you don’t know what you are talking about. You obviously hate Catholics and this comment sounds very immature/childish.

  6. catholic #3 on October 5th, 2009 1:46 am

    babies r tasty

  7. Elise on October 27th, 2009 6:08 pm

    I think the origin comes from Johnathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal,” which was a proposal to stop the poverty in 18th century Ireland (mostly Catholic at the time, Protestants were still a minority) by having the beggar women sell their children for 10 or so shillings to the wealthier English society as food. It was a rather interesting piece, but it is a dark satire aimed at correcting a situation with ridicule and sarcasm.

    My grandmother was asked at then her young future sister in-law, if it was true that Catholics eat their babies, because she was Catholic. My grandmother, relieved that someone actually spoke to her besides my grandfather, laughed and said, “No.”

    Besides, if Catholics ate their babies, that would go against their general pro-life stance. Remember, thou shalt not kill?

  8. William K. Wolfrum Chronicles » Blog Archive » Getting blasphemous before the UN, United States declare it a “misused freedom” on October 28th, 2009 4:34 am

    [...] The resolution is A/HRC/12/L.14/Rev.1 [PDF] and titled “Promotion and Protection of all Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, including the Right to Development.” The resolution – which passed unanimously – included this section: 4. Also expresses its concern that incidents of racial and religious intolerance, discrimination and related violence, as well as of negative racial and religious stereotyping of religions and racial groups continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in this context, any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, and urges States to take effective measures, consistent with their obligations under international human rights law international human rights, to address and combat such incidents; [...]

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!





WordPress SEO fine-tune by Meta SEO Pack from Poradnik Webmastera