<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geostationary Banana Over Texas could have George Bush flying high</title>
	<link>http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2007/09/26/geostationary-banana-over-texas-could-have-george-bush-flying-high/</link>
	<description>Bill Wolfrum's world of satire and commentary</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  7 Sep 2008 23:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: dgun</title>
		<link>http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2007/09/26/geostationary-banana-over-texas-could-have-george-bush-flying-high/#comment-50857</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2007/09/26/geostationary-banana-over-texas-could-have-george-bush-flying-high/#comment-50857</guid>
					<description>&quot;scientician&quot;

I'm not some sort of wordolgist....

Anyway, I don't know if balloons can go into orbit either Rufus. Because if that was the case, it would seem they could save a lot of money launching satellites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;scientician&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not some sort of wordolgist&#8230;.</p>
<p>Anyway, I don&#8217;t know if balloons can go into orbit either Rufus. Because if that was the case, it would seem they could save a lot of money launching satellites.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rufus</title>
		<link>http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2007/09/26/geostationary-banana-over-texas-could-have-george-bush-flying-high/#comment-50834</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2007/09/26/geostationary-banana-over-texas-could-have-george-bush-flying-high/#comment-50834</guid>
					<description>I'm no scientician, but it seems to me that this &quot;project&quot; is little more than a million-dollar pipe dream. Is there some solid science involved in this project? I didn't see any evidence of such at the website. And wouldn't pie be more appropriate anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no scientician, but it seems to me that this &#8220;project&#8221; is little more than a million-dollar pipe dream. Is there some solid science involved in this project? I didn&#8217;t see any evidence of such at the website. And wouldn&#8217;t pie be more appropriate anyway?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
