<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One-Liner: Corporations won&#8217;t &#8220;Go Galt&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/03/13/one-liner-corporations-wont-go-galt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/03/13/one-liner-corporations-wont-go-galt/</link>
	<description>Bill Wolfrum&#039;s world of news, satire and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:42:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>By: dgun</title>
		<link>http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/03/13/one-liner-corporations-wont-go-galt/comment-page-1/#comment-209058</link>
		<dc:creator>dgun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/03/13/one-liner-corporations-wont-go-galt/#comment-209058</guid>
		<description>Wow. And I thought you were just dropping a reference to a Futurama episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. And I thought you were just dropping a reference to a Futurama episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hugh.c.mcbride</title>
		<link>http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/03/13/one-liner-corporations-wont-go-galt/comment-page-1/#comment-208545</link>
		<dc:creator>hugh.c.mcbride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/03/13/one-liner-corporations-wont-go-galt/#comment-208545</guid>
		<description>dgun: thanks so much for muddling through my whole comment, &amp; for focusing on the obvious &quot;money quote&quot; -- here&#039;s where I got that particular politico-linguistic gem (from a March 7, 2009 post on BoingBoing):

At an anti-gay marriage rally Tuesday in Raleigh, North Carolina, David Gibbs III, the Christian fundamentalist lawyer who fought to keep brain-damaged Terry Schiavo on life support in 2005, publicly expressed his deep-seated fear of machine love. From the News &amp; Observer:

(Gibbs) told rally participants gay marriage would &quot;open the door to unusual marriage in North Carolina.

&quot;Why not polygamy, or three or four spouses?&quot; Gibbs asked. &quot;Maybe people will want to marry their pets or robots.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dgun: thanks so much for muddling through my whole comment, &amp; for focusing on the obvious &#8220;money quote&#8221; &#8212; here&#8217;s where I got that particular politico-linguistic gem (from a March 7, 2009 post on BoingBoing):</p>
<p>At an anti-gay marriage rally Tuesday in Raleigh, North Carolina, David Gibbs III, the Christian fundamentalist lawyer who fought to keep brain-damaged Terry Schiavo on life support in 2005, publicly expressed his deep-seated fear of machine love. From the News &amp; Observer:</p>
<p>(Gibbs) told rally participants gay marriage would &#8220;open the door to unusual marriage in North Carolina.</p>
<p>&#8220;Why not polygamy, or three or four spouses?&#8221; Gibbs asked. &#8220;Maybe people will want to marry their pets or robots.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William K. Wolfrum</title>
		<link>http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/03/13/one-liner-corporations-wont-go-galt/comment-page-1/#comment-208341</link>
		<dc:creator>William K. Wolfrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/03/13/one-liner-corporations-wont-go-galt/#comment-208341</guid>
		<description>Nothing produces sparks like robot sex.

thankyoo.thankyoooverymuch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing produces sparks like robot sex.</p>
<p>thankyoo.thankyoooverymuch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgun</title>
		<link>http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/03/13/one-liner-corporations-wont-go-galt/comment-page-1/#comment-208093</link>
		<dc:creator>dgun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 04:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/03/13/one-liner-corporations-wont-go-galt/#comment-208093</guid>
		<description>Care to elaborate on this &quot;Robot Sex&quot; you speak of, Mr. Hugh? Will this in any way involve sexy Halle Berry androids? 

* Please say yes *</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Care to elaborate on this &#8220;Robot Sex&#8221; you speak of, Mr. Hugh? Will this in any way involve sexy Halle Berry androids? </p>
<p>* Please say yes *</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hugh.c.mcbride</title>
		<link>http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/03/13/one-liner-corporations-wont-go-galt/comment-page-1/#comment-207865</link>
		<dc:creator>hugh.c.mcbride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/03/13/one-liner-corporations-wont-go-galt/#comment-207865</guid>
		<description>Sorry, dgun, you may fool yer librul friends with yer fancy book-learnin&#039; &amp; yer arithmetical tricks, but I learned the real true truth the other day from Victoria &quot;So Far Ahead of the Curve I &#039;Went Galt&#039; By Disappearing from Public View 15 Years Ago&quot; Jackson: 

Working more = Earning more = Paying More Taxes = Communism = Godlessness = Cats &amp; Dogs Living Together = Half-Breed Muslins Running Wild = Robot Sex = Congressmen Wearing Diapers with Prostitutes = Stalin&#039;s Reanimated Corpse Rising From The Grave &amp; Closing Guantanamo Bay

At least, that is, &#039;til Texas President Chucky Norris returns us to fiscal sanity via the flat tax, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, dgun, you may fool yer librul friends with yer fancy book-learnin&#8217; &amp; yer arithmetical tricks, but I learned the real true truth the other day from Victoria &#8220;So Far Ahead of the Curve I &#8216;Went Galt&#8217; By Disappearing from Public View 15 Years Ago&#8221; Jackson: </p>
<p>Working more = Earning more = Paying More Taxes = Communism = Godlessness = Cats &amp; Dogs Living Together = Half-Breed Muslins Running Wild = Robot Sex = Congressmen Wearing Diapers with Prostitutes = Stalin&#8217;s Reanimated Corpse Rising From The Grave &amp; Closing Guantanamo Bay</p>
<p>At least, that is, &#8217;til Texas President Chucky Norris returns us to fiscal sanity via the flat tax, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgun</title>
		<link>http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/03/13/one-liner-corporations-wont-go-galt/comment-page-1/#comment-207364</link>
		<dc:creator>dgun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 03:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/03/13/one-liner-corporations-wont-go-galt/#comment-207364</guid>
		<description>The problem with going Galt is the math. Generally speaking, people of wealth prefer more money to less. Paying more taxes on greater income is going to be a net gain over paying less tax on less income.

And this idea that everyone responsible for creating jobs in this country is wealthy is nonsense.

&lt;blockquote&gt;According to the 1997 report of the U.S. Census Bureau, the nation’s 17 million small, non-farm businesses constituted 99.7 per cent of all employers, employed 52 percent of private workforce and accounted for 51 percent of the nation’s sales. Small business-dominated industries provided 11.1 million new jobs between 1994 and 1998, virtually all of the new jobs created during that time period. Small businesses are most likely to generate jobs for young workers, older workers and women, provide 67 percent of first jobs and produce 55 percent of innovations.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dol.gov/odep/pubs/ek00/small.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with going Galt is the math. Generally speaking, people of wealth prefer more money to less. Paying more taxes on greater income is going to be a net gain over paying less tax on less income.</p>
<p>And this idea that everyone responsible for creating jobs in this country is wealthy is nonsense.</p>
<blockquote><p>According to the 1997 report of the U.S. Census Bureau, the nation’s 17 million small, non-farm businesses constituted 99.7 per cent of all employers, employed 52 percent of private workforce and accounted for 51 percent of the nation’s sales. Small business-dominated industries provided 11.1 million new jobs between 1994 and 1998, virtually all of the new jobs created during that time period. Small businesses are most likely to generate jobs for young workers, older workers and women, provide 67 percent of first jobs and produce 55 percent of innovations.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.dol.gov/odep/pubs/ek00/small.htm" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
