<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Martin Eisenstadt was NOT the source of the Sarah Palin/Africa story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/10/25/martin-eisenstadt-was-not-the-source-of-the-sarah-palinafrica-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/10/25/martin-eisenstadt-was-not-the-source-of-the-sarah-palinafrica-story/</link>
	<description>Bill Wolfrum&#039;s world of news, satire and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:59:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>By: William K. Wolfrum</title>
		<link>http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/10/25/martin-eisenstadt-was-not-the-source-of-the-sarah-palinafrica-story/comment-page-1/#comment-259609</link>
		<dc:creator>William K. Wolfrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/10/25/martin-eisenstadt-was-not-the-source-of-the-sarah-palinafrica-story/#comment-259609</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Hugh. I wrote it because I &lt;a href=&quot;http://rightwingsparkle.blogspot.com/2009/10/when-hoax-is-something-to-worry-about.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;stumbled across this&lt;/a&gt;, and with the book coming out I&#039;m sure that meme will spread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Hugh. I wrote it because I <a href="http://rightwingsparkle.blogspot.com/2009/10/when-hoax-is-something-to-worry-about.html" rel="nofollow">stumbled across this</a>, and with the book coming out I&#8217;m sure that meme will spread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hugh.c.mcbride</title>
		<link>http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/10/25/martin-eisenstadt-was-not-the-source-of-the-sarah-palinafrica-story/comment-page-1/#comment-259590</link>
		<dc:creator>hugh.c.mcbride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 06:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/10/25/martin-eisenstadt-was-not-the-source-of-the-sarah-palinafrica-story/#comment-259590</guid>
		<description>Bill: Thank you for writing this post. 

When the &quot;Eisenstadt source&quot; aspect of the Palin/Africa story broke, I thought that the revelation was exactly as you describe it here: that the hoax was Eisenstadt&#039;s claim of being the source, *not* that Eisenstadt had created &amp; planted the claim that Palin didn&#039;t know if Africa was a continent or a country.

However, once the Eisenstadt claim was debunked, general consensus seemed to be that ol&#039; Marty had made whole thing up. The fact that no one appeared to follow up or clarify the story line was, I believe, likely due to the fact that the dominant media appear to be stunningly uninterested in clarifying matters that (a) call attention to their ineptitude and (b) don&#039;t involve loud noises, shiny objects, or runaway balloons that may or may not contain six-year-olds. Also, considering the virtual deluge of revelations that confirmed the suspicion that Palin is, indeed, a moron, the Africa story got lost in the shuffle among the many other &quot;real&quot; stories.

All that said, though, the unwillingness or inability to clarify what was and was not hoax material is, to me, just one more example of &quot;unimportant&quot; matters being overlooked or brushed under the proverbial rug in the rush to get to the next big story. And while big stories and big-picture issues are important, the media&#039;s habit of ignoring the little stuff feels a lot like an architect deciding to design a building by focusing only on the facade, while wasting no time on the boring details that no one will see (but which are responsible for keeping the structure upright &amp; intact).

Again, thanks for this and the many other efforts you make to ensure that someone is paying attention to the little details. Heckuva post for a Sunday afternoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill: Thank you for writing this post. </p>
<p>When the &#8220;Eisenstadt source&#8221; aspect of the Palin/Africa story broke, I thought that the revelation was exactly as you describe it here: that the hoax was Eisenstadt&#8217;s claim of being the source, *not* that Eisenstadt had created &amp; planted the claim that Palin didn&#8217;t know if Africa was a continent or a country.</p>
<p>However, once the Eisenstadt claim was debunked, general consensus seemed to be that ol&#8217; Marty had made whole thing up. The fact that no one appeared to follow up or clarify the story line was, I believe, likely due to the fact that the dominant media appear to be stunningly uninterested in clarifying matters that (a) call attention to their ineptitude and (b) don&#8217;t involve loud noises, shiny objects, or runaway balloons that may or may not contain six-year-olds. Also, considering the virtual deluge of revelations that confirmed the suspicion that Palin is, indeed, a moron, the Africa story got lost in the shuffle among the many other &#8220;real&#8221; stories.</p>
<p>All that said, though, the unwillingness or inability to clarify what was and was not hoax material is, to me, just one more example of &#8220;unimportant&#8221; matters being overlooked or brushed under the proverbial rug in the rush to get to the next big story. And while big stories and big-picture issues are important, the media&#8217;s habit of ignoring the little stuff feels a lot like an architect deciding to design a building by focusing only on the facade, while wasting no time on the boring details that no one will see (but which are responsible for keeping the structure upright &amp; intact).</p>
<p>Again, thanks for this and the many other efforts you make to ensure that someone is paying attention to the little details. Heckuva post for a Sunday afternoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgun</title>
		<link>http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/10/25/martin-eisenstadt-was-not-the-source-of-the-sarah-palinafrica-story/comment-page-1/#comment-259563</link>
		<dc:creator>dgun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2009/10/25/martin-eisenstadt-was-not-the-source-of-the-sarah-palinafrica-story/#comment-259563</guid>
		<description>Africa is a continent. I would like to offer my services to the GOP as a Vice Presidential candidate, you betcha.

(I wonder if I can spin the one season I spent as an assistant coach on my kid&#039;s soccer team as executive experience?)

The bias liberal media will start attacking me soon. They can&#039;t deal with an independent minded maverick who knows the difference between a continent and a country.  Katie Couric will be disappointed when she pops her trick question about Australia. I&#039;m not afraid of her, anyway. I&#039;ve defended myself against bears attacking my helicopter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Africa is a continent. I would like to offer my services to the GOP as a Vice Presidential candidate, you betcha.</p>
<p>(I wonder if I can spin the one season I spent as an assistant coach on my kid&#8217;s soccer team as executive experience?)</p>
<p>The bias liberal media will start attacking me soon. They can&#8217;t deal with an independent minded maverick who knows the difference between a continent and a country.  Katie Couric will be disappointed when she pops her trick question about Australia. I&#8217;m not afraid of her, anyway. I&#8217;ve defended myself against bears attacking my helicopter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
