Getting blasphemous before the UN, United States declare it a “misused freedom”

October 28, 2009 by William K. Wolfrum 

At the United Nations recently, the Obama Administration joined Egypt in presenting a non-binding resolution to in the U.N. Human Rights Council to protect the freedoms of peoples around the world.

The resolution is A/HRC/12/L.14/Rev.1 [PDF] and titled “Promotion and Protection of all Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, including the Right to Development.” The resolution – which passed unanimously – included this section:

4. Also expresses its concern that incidents of racial and religious intolerance, discrimination and related violence, as well as of negative racial and religious stereotyping of religions and racial groups continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in this context, any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, and urges States to take effective measures, consistent with their obligations under international human rights law international human rights, to address and combat such incidents;

The Egyptian ambassador to the U.N., Hisham Badr, applauded the teamwork between his nation and the U.S., stating “freedom of expression has been sometimes misused” and the “true nature of this right” must yield government limitations.

This section has caused an uproar amongst many, including Atheist groups and other civil libertarians that fear the slippery slope of censorship. As I see it, this battle is far from over, but many Muslim nations like Egypt – which already has draconian anti-free speech policies – have put in the heavy lifting to make blasphemy an international crime. So regardless of the “non-binding” part, this is a battle that free-speech proponents need to win.

There’s still hope, mind you. Secretary of Defense Hillary Clinton has spoken out against an effort by the Organization of the Islamic Conference to get the U.N. Human Rights Council to adopt resolutions that crack down hard against blasphemy:

“Some claim that the best way to protect the freedom of religion is to implement so-called anti-defamation policies. . . . I strongly disagree,” Clinton said. “The protection of speech about religion is particularly important since persons of different faiths will inevitably hold divergent views on religious questions.”

Just in case, however, I think it may be best for me to get as much of blasphemy out of my system before I become an international speech criminal. So, let’s misuse some freedoms while we still can:

Blasphemy Bonanza

Catholicism: Nothing quite like having some dude in a fancy robe condemning millions of Africans to death via AIDS because he demonizes condom usage as a sin. One wonders if the Pope has informed his pedophile priests to not use condoms when they destroy the lives of children?

Christianity: It’s amazing that all the scribes back then missed out on seeing a three-day dead dude physically ascend to the heavens after creating a huge ruckus. It’s even more amazing the people are so convinced there really was a Jesus Christ, especially after you learn that his same story had been told many times before.

Judaism: Sure, there was no Jesus Christ. But let’s blame his death on you guys, anyway.

Islam: Nothing quite like having your top prophet marry a 6-year-old to get you to pray five times a day. Seriously folks, have a BLT and a beer and chill the fuck out.

Mormonism: A guy wanders into the woods alone and comes out with a religion. No, it’s not the beginning of a joke, it’s the beginning of the Church of Latter Day Saints. You folks aren’t fooling anyone. We know it’s just a plot for white folks to have an American Jesus while being racist, homophobic and marrying as often as you want.

Scientology: My mistake. This isn’t a religion. It’s a Ponzi scheme.

Jainism:Go ahead, just suck in a microbe already. They don’t give a shit.

Hinduism: Ok, we’re all doing yoga now. So go pray to an elephant or something and leave the rest of us alone.

Buddhism: Smoking a joint will get you as enlightened as you need. The rest of it is just an overwhelming desire to sit.

Rastafari: I said “A joint.” Once you start rapid-firing the cannabis, you start believing this guy is Jesus Christ:

Wicca: Oh for fuck’s sake, you aren’t a witch.

Sikhism: We don’t care what you say or do – we all think you’re Muslim, anyway.
____________________

While preaching for violent acts against any group is never to be tolerated, this issue is about the rights of all – from the lowliest serf to the richest land baron – to be able to speak out, or for, institutions that already have too much control over their lives. If slippery slopes are your thing, this UN non-binding resolution is overlooking an extremely deep chasm.

–WKW

  • Stumbleupon
  • Delicious

Comments

6 Responses to “Getting blasphemous before the UN, United States declare it a “misused freedom””

  1. Michael on October 28th, 2009 5:43 am

    Don’t forget the guy Ben Folds sang about. The guy was tripping on acid at a party, and climbed a tree, and when he came down in the morning, he was a born-again Christian. True story.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8gryqG790A&feature=player_embedded

    There’s also a street preacher named “Jed” who travels Arizona and New Mexico. He found Jesus in a similar way, and wants to get his message to the college kids that they can’t find Jesus on acid. Even though Jed did.

  2. William K. Wolfrum on October 28th, 2009 6:11 am

    Off-topic, but I recently had someone tell me a story about taking acid at the beach then having a convo with someone and then laughing non-stop for 15 minutes. When the laughing stopped, her trip ended and she went home lol.

  3. The Big Blue Frog on October 28th, 2009 8:01 am

    “Blasphemy is a victimless crime.”

  4. dgun on October 28th, 2009 3:53 pm

    I read about this a while back. Although I don’t agree with the paragraph in question, if most countries of the world (read, not us) implemented the non-binding resolution, it would have an overall positive impact on world-wide freedom of expression.

    And I’m sure the paragraph made it into the non-binding resolution as a compromise to get support for the resolution. I wonder how much ‘holocaust denying’ laws of Europe influenced the language of the resolution? But considering that even binding resolutions from the UN are often vain gestures and fool’s errands, I’m not sure how wise it was politically to back a non-binding resolution that included such language.

  5. stillwaters on October 30th, 2009 6:49 am

    That’s the problem with religion. They can’t take a joke.

  6. RS Janes on October 31st, 2009 2:27 pm

    The butt of the joke often doesn’t find it funny, especially if it doesn’t increase the amount of money to be collected on the dead bones of the founder or founders.

    As to Islam, it should be noted that The Prophet who got the whole Muslim thing running married a Jewish woman and worked for her in her spice business. Mohammad may have been an example of the Socrates quote, “If you get a good wife, you’ll become happy; if you get a bad one, you’ll become a philosopher.” And if you get a really bad wife, you start a religion.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!





WordPress SEO fine-tune by Meta SEO Pack from Poradnik Webmastera